This is part 4 in my plane tune-up series.  In this post, I’ll be fettling the body of the plane.  I got it back from the machinist a while ago, about two weeks after dropping it off.   However, I didn’t take a good look at it when I picked it up.  Steve at Winger Tool was having some problems with his grinding wheel and the sole wasn’t as smooth as I wanted.  It was probably just fine from a functional standpoint, but it didn’t look that great, certainly not up to his usual standards.  It took me a while to get it back down to him…

He cleaned it up for me, taking off an additional two or three thousandths.  Here’s a photo of the bottom.

The grinding process leaves the edges of the body pretty sharp.  I use a mill smooth file to lightly file the side edges, hitting them just enough to keep them from cutting me.

Similarly, I file the front and back edges.  I’m careful not to remove too much material here, as rounding these areas too much may allow the plane, in use, to ride up and over shavings or debris in its path.  Here are before and after shots of the back edge of the plane.

The mouth of the plane is next.  The mouth holds the shaving down during use to help reduce tearout.  In order to do that well, the front edge of the mouth should be square to the body and straight.  It should also be relatively sharp; when viewed from the side of the plane, the arris between the sole and the vertical part of the mouth should not have any radius.  Here, I’m checking the mouth with a combination square.

Another view of the mouth prior to modification:

The mouth on this plane is surprisingly good.  Typically, they aren’t quite square and rarely this straight.  It won’t take much to get this one in fine shape.  I’ll discuss fettling the mouth in the next post.

I’ve been busy recently with a carpentry project.  When I say carpentry, I’m talking about tolerances greater than 1/8″.  Tolerances on furniture projects are typically pretty tight; plus or minus 1/8″ just doesn’t work in that context.

The project I’m currently engaged in is a cover for our patio.  The patio was completed a  couple of years ago, using the broken concrete from our old driveway for the floor.  About the same time the floor was completed, I came across some cypress logs left over from the grape arbor restoration at nearby Rancho Los Alamitos.  They were perfect for our use.  Here’s a photo of the project in work.

The reason I’m mentioning this project has to do with the title of this post.  While I was out in the alley behind the garage, with six 4 x 4 x 16′s strapped on top of my Toyota RAV4 (thanks to my Yakima rack), one of my neighbors drove by.  He looked at the state of affairs and said, “You’re a compulsive builder, aren’t you?”

My first thought was, “…and your point is?…”  I’m not sure quite how he meant it, but it made me think.  Yes, I am a compulsive builder.  No, there’s nothing wrong with that.  I could quit any time…  Well, maybe not.

I’m okay with the title, though.   In fact, I kind of like it.

I have finally uploaded a bunch of images to my portfolio.  Click the Portfolio link above to check it out.

The first order of business for cleanup is the body of the plane.  If it’s not in decent shape, all I have is a paperweight with some spare parts.  During the cleanup process, I’ll primarily be looking for cracks.

I use paint thinner or kerosene to clean the metal parts.  I pour it in a pan and use a toothbrush to clean most surfaces.  Because there are lots of corners which the toothbrush won’t reach, I also use an acid brush with the bristles cut to about 3/8″.  It does a much better job of getting into the corners.

I use a Q-Tip to get into the screw holes.  I also thread the appropriate screws in and out of the threaded holes a few times, which along with the solvent, cleans things up nicely.

The japanning is typically chipped off in many places, and the cast iron below is often rusted.  I use a small wire brush with light pressure to clean up the rust.  Too much pressure will scratch the japanning.

This plane had some white paint splattered on it, which did not come off with the wire brush.  I used a somewhat dull scratch awl to pick away at the paint.  The scratch awl was also helpful in cleaning the corner areas near the frog interface.  Here’s a detail photo of the cleaned up body.  Lots of pitting, but I’ll deal with that later.

Next, I want to determine if the sole is flat.  The area of most concern is around the mouth.  In order for the plane to work well, the mouth area needs to be in close contact with the wood.  I use a straightedge to check.

Not good.  At the most important location, the front edge of the mouth, the sole of the plane is about .010 hollow.  If I wanted to use the plane for relatively rough work, this wouldn’t be a problem.  But I use my #5 for all kinds of things, including smoothing, and I want the sole flat.    How to get there?

It’s quite possible to do this yourself with some sandpaper and a flat surface.  With the price of sandpaper at least a buck a sheet, and my time valued at something greater than $10/hr, it’s a no-brainer for me.  I’m going to have it machined.  There are  two grinding shops in the Los Angeles area who have done this for me before, Ro-La Grinding in Culver City and Winger Tool in Stanton.  Ro-La was “trained” in the art of plane grinding by Allan Boardman back in the 1980′s.  Steve Winger’s shop used to be adjacent to Cerritos College, where I teach.  We got him up to speed a few years ago and he has since ground many planes for our handtool class students.

So, it’s off to the grind shop for the next step.  When I get the body back, I’ll do a bit more cleanup and deal with the chipped japanning.

I finally received the plane I won on eBay.  The seller mailed it quickly after the auction ended, but due to the Memorial Day weekend I didn’t get it until over a week later.  The “unboxing” went well, although the box itself was a bit ruffled.  The corner was broken out and I could see the end of the plane.  The only padding was a paper bag.  Fortunately, the plane was okay.

I was able to quickly determine that it’s a Type 11, my first choice in Stanley plane types.  The three patent dates mean Type 11 or 12; the low knob and small adjuster nut indicate a Type 11.  A quick look showed no serious defects, no cracks, no missing parts.

Given the amount of crud on the plane, it was obvious it hadn’t been cleaned in quite a while.  It had been used, however, as the handle, knob, and blade adjustment nut were clean.  Whoever owned it before didn’t care much about appearances!  The blade was still pretty long, so it hadn’t been sharpened a bunch.  Good news.

Taking the lever cap off was easy.  If the lever cap is difficult to get off, it means either something is frozen up or it was put on too tight.  Too tight often means someone tightened the lever cap with the screw instead of the lever (not a good thing).  The frog attach screws also came out easily.  Things were still looking good.

Wow!  Lots of crud around and under the frog; apparently, it hadn’t been removed in quite a while.  Not a problem; actually a good sign.  Why good?   Many people tend to overtighten screws and/or use the wrong size screwdriver, which can mess up screw heads.  These are in great shape.

Next, the blade.  If it’s too rusted on the non-beveled side, it won’t be useable without lots of work.

Both blade and chipbreaker look pretty good.  I see no major pitting on the blade near the edge, although it’s a little hard to see until it’s cleaned up some more.  The other end of the blade is bent, but I should be able to fix that.  The chipbreaker looks great.  From what I understand, the black on the underside is from the heat-treating process.  Usually, it’s not this clean and consistent.  Another good sign.

Here’s a photo of all the parts.  Everything looks great and I think this plane will clean up very nicely to make a great user.

I was amazed at how much crud came out of the plane, so I included it in the photo.  As for the rest of the parts, I’ll discuss how I clean them up in future posts.  When the plane is complete, I’ll be selling it on eBay.  My current #5 has been with me for a long time and I don’t need another one.

I just purchased a plane on eBay.  Not that I need another  plane…  I just wanted to describe the steps I take to tune up a bench plane, and I neglected to purchase a suitable plane last week at the quarterly Old Tool Swap at Anderson Plywood in Culver City.  Just plane forgot…

Stanley #5

The plane is a Stanley #5.  It’s a little hard to tell in the photo, but I think it’s a Type 11 – low knob, no raised ring around knob, no logo on lever cap, small adjuster knob.  When purchasing old Stanley bench planes, the Type 11 is my first choice; I like the low knob.  Types 11 through 16, however, have the main features I’m looking for:  frog-adjusting screw, rosewood knob and tote, and the frog is accurately located front and back (more on that later).  If you want more info on Stanley plane types, there’s plenty on the web; Google this if you’re interested.

The seller only posted the photo above and this description “Nice #5 Baily wood plane.  Blade is a Stanley with the Sweetheart mark. Handle has a chip removed at the top; but no cracks. A few spots of lite rust. This is as found, has not been cleaned.”  Bidding started at $9.90 and shipping was $13.03.  Perfect for my project.

When purchasing an old plane, I have the following questions:

  1. Is anything cracked?  Cracks on the body around the mouth area immediately disqualify the purchase.
  2. Are all the parts there?  Parts can be replaced, but I’d prefer to not mess with hunting down replacement parts.
  3. Is the blade salvageable?  No pitting near the tip, lots of blade left, and flat.  Ron Hock and others make great replacement irons, but this will add about $35 to the plane.  Ditto for the chipbreaker, but at a lesser cost.
  4. Is there a lot of rust?  Surface rust is no problem, but when parts are really pitted, I’ll pass.
  5. Are the handle and tote salvageable?  No serious cracks.  A chipped handle (like this plane) can be fixed, but some damage isn’t worth fixing and will require replacement.
  6. Are the adjustment knob and lateral adjusting lever working well?  The brass adjustment knob can get pretty trashed where it interfaces with the Y-adjusting lever, or the knurling can be worn off.  The lateral adjusting lever rivets can be loose, the washer may be missing, or the little tab at the far end of the lever can be loose or missing.  The knob is easy to replace, but replacing the lateral adjusting lever is tricky business.

From what I could see in the photo, everything looked pretty good, but I needed more info.  I emailed the seller to see if he could supply some additional photos.  He did, emailing me three pics.  They showed the underside of the body around the mouth; the blade/chipbreaker and lever cap; and the area behind the frog.  Not great pics, but enough for me to determine what I’d spend on the plane.

I decided my maximum price would be $35 including the shipping, which worked out to a max bid of $21.97.  No one was bidding on the plane, so I hoped I might get it for much less.  Turns out, I got the plane with a winning bid of $12.47, for a total price of $25.50.  I quickly paid, and the seller shipped it the next day.

As I write this it’s on way from Connecticut to Southern California…

Finally getting back to the blog.   My apologies for the absence.  This post is really just a test to see if everything is working correctly;  I just updated the WordPress software that’s running the site.

When my sister got married, my wedding present to her and her husband was a project yet to be determined.  I should have known better, but my heart was in the right place (or at least that’s what I tell myself).

The project for a while was a coffee table, but that never worked out.  I just didn’t have the time to take that on.  Over the years (I’m embarrassed to say how many) the topic of the wedding present would come up.  My sister would mention it in passing, just a little reminder of a promise unkept.  A little (well-deserved) jab.  Nothing malicious, but I knew she hadn’t forgotten about it.

Last year, in a span of a few months, two of their cats died.  Both had had long comfortable lives, but their passing was a big loss, especially to my brother-in-law; they were his cats prior to their marriage.  My sister saw her opportunity.

Two urns to hold the ashen remains of two beloved cats.  I could do that.

She gave me the dimensions of the little plastic boxes that held the little plastic bags of ashes, and I was set.  The boxes were about 2″ x 2″ x 4″.  My idea was to make veneered urns.  To make them special, the edges would be a contrasting color.

I started with 1/2″ MDF and veneered one side with walnut.  That would be the inside of the boxes.  I then constructed the box sides using rabbets in the corners to keep things aligned.  The tops and bottoms were then just glued on with no special joinery…I think.  I started the boxes last fall and don’t remember exactly how I constructed them.

Once the boxes were glued up, I sanded all the outside surfaces flat, then cut 3/16″ x 3/16″ rabbets on the four long edges.  I glued ebony into the rabbets, sanded things smooth, then cut eight more rabbets in the remaining edges.  More ebony (no, I didn’t miter the corners), more sanding, and I had MDF boxes with black trim on all the edges.

I then veneered all the faces.  One box got redwood burl, the other myrtle burl.  More sanding to get everything flat, then the edges were shaped.  The redwood burl box got rabbets; the myrtle burl box got chamfers.

The boxes were then cut into two parts, and I glued 1/8″ ebony to the cut surfaces, mitering the corners.  More sanding.

I spent a lot of time figuring out the next step:  locating and attaching the tops to the bottoms.  I finally settled on a mortise and tenon (maybe tongue and groove is more accurate) solution.  I cut mortises in opposite corners of the tops and bottoms, then glued ebony tenons into the mortises on the bottoms.  The parts were all shaped by hand to fit nicely, with mitered corners and rounded ends, and the tenons in each corner were different lengths to ensure alignment.

After final sanding, gel poly was applied, then waxed.  The tops fit snugly but are removed with a little effort, just right for something that needn’t be opened much if ever.   I was very happy with how they came out, but more importantly, so were my sister and brother-in-law. 

Two urns

Top attachment

Redwood burl, rabbeted edge

Myrtle burl, chamfered edge

I’m back!  I lost some momentum on posting to the blog when I went on vacation last month.  I’m hoping to get back on track and posting about once a week starting with this post.

My hall table was finished with gel polyurethane, which up until recently was one of my favorite finishes.  Woodkote made a very nice gel poly, called Jel’d Poly Kote, which I found to be easy to apply, allowed recoating in two hours, had reasonable build qualities, a generous working time, and gave great results.  What more could you ask for?

How about not changing the product???

Apparently, to meet the South Coast Air Quality Manangement District’s 2006 VOC requirements, WoodKote had to change the formulation.  According to the the MSDS, the old product had a VOC count of 589 grams/liter; the new product VOC is 273 g/l.  The old product had 35-45% naptha and 20-30% alkyd resin, the new product has no naptha and 15-25% alkyd resin.  I’m no chemist, but I know that naptha slows drying, and higher amounts of alkyd resin would(?) increase the build.

The result?  A runny, slow building, fast drying (short working time) product that is no better than any other of the gely poly’s I have tried (Rockler, General Finishes, and Behlen, if I remember correctly).  Very disappointing.

I’m just finding this out now because I finished off my old can in the middle of finishing the hall table.  If you know of another gel poly that is worth trying, please comment.  I’d love to try it out.

Woodkote Jel'd Poly Kote 275

I went to the Design in Wood show yesterday, the woodworking competition/exhibition of the San Diego County Fair, held in Del Mar on the racetrack grounds.   As usual, the work was amazing.  The San Diego Fine Woodworking Association helps put on the event and this is their 28th year.  Work from all over the country is presented, of course, mostly from California.

I’m happy to say that several Cerritos College students (or former students) won awards.  Nick Kleha got 2nd in Veneering/Marquetry Furniture for his Period Game Table:

Kleha Table

Bruce Lewellyn got 2nd in Wood Turning – Laminated/Segmented:

Lewellyn turning

He also got 4th in Wood Turning – Face Work: Perpendicular, and an Honorable Mention

Dick Foreman got two Honorable Mentions, this one in Wood Turning – Embellished/Mixed Media:

Foreman turning

View the first-place winners in each category here.

If you’re in the area, try to visit, you won’t be disapp0inted.  The fair runs until July 5; admission is $13, parking $10.

« Older entries